Publicado em Thursday, May 17th, 2012 por ElToreroBombero

 click para aumentar...

1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e3 e6 5. Nf3 a6 6. b3 {
Exactly the same system as in round two.} Bb4 7. Bd2 Nbd7 8. Bd3 O-O 9. O-O Bd6
10. Qc2 {This time, Gelfand goes for the main move, deviating from the second
game, where 10.Rc1 was played.} e5 !? (10... h6 {is the main move according to
theory, but 10... e5 worked very well for Black in all the games played till
now.}) 11. cxd5 cxd5 12. e4 {Of course taking on e5 would no longer make any
sense with the rook on a1 and the queen on c2.} exd4 13. Nxd5 Nxd5 14. exd5 Nf6
{[%eval 28,0]} 15. h3 !? {A very logical move played only once. Against almost
all other moves, Black would go 15...Bg4 and simply equalize. [%eval 24,0]} (
15. Qc4 Bg4 16. Qxd4 Bxf3 17. gxf3 Nxd5 $11 {
1/2-1/2 (36) Avrukh,B (2632)-Wang,H (2684) Dagomys RUS 2008}) (15. Rfe1 Bg4 16.
Nxd4 Rc8 17. Qb2 Rc5 $11 {
1/2-1/2 (70) Aleksandrov,A (2636)-Kharlov,A (2511) RUS 2009}) (15. Nxd4 Be5 $11
) 15... Bd7 {Anand keeps playing very fast. [%eval 32,0]} 16. Rad1 {
[%eval 23,0]} ({There was no hurry to play ...h6, since after} 16. Bg5 h6 17.
Bh4 Rc8 18. Qd2 Rc5 $1 {it seems Black equalizes.}) 16... Re8
17. Nxd4 {[%eval 38,0]} Rc8 {[%eval 56,0]} 18. Qb1 {[%eval 52,0]} h6 {
We reached the typical setup in that kind of structures, where White is up a
pawn that he cannot really hold. The only question is always: can White force
Black to capture the pawn back in poor conditions? [%eval 72,0]} 19. Nf5 {
Of course after taking the bishop pair, White has a very (very) slight
advantage, but it doesn't seem enough at all. It seems to me that after 19.Nf3
White would have decent chances to get some advantage, though Anand had been
playing very fast until 18...h6, which should mean he has some precise idea
against 19.Nf3. [%eval 40,0]} (19. Nf3 $5 Nxd5 ({
Of course it would be possible to delay ...Nxd5, but after a move like} 19...
Qc7 {White could go} 20. Bc1 {and slowly reorganize his pieces, and it looks
clear to me that Black should have some problems, though maybe solvable.}) 20.
Be4 $1 (20. Bh7+ Kh8 21. Bxh6 $2 {doesn't work because of} Nc3 $17) 20... Bc6
21. Nd4 {and White can take the bishop pair, and I don't see how Black can
exactly equalize, e.g.} Qb6 (21... Nc3 $2 22. Bh7+ (22. Nxc6 Nxb1 23. Nxd8 Nxd2
24. Rxd2 Rcxd8 $11) 22... Kh8 23. Bxc3 {
and according to the engine Black is still in the game with} Bxg2 $1 {but after
} 24. Nf5 $8 Bxh3 (24... Be4 25. Qc1 $8 Rxc3 26. Qxc3 Qg5+ 27. Ng3 $16) 25.
Bxg7+ Kxh7 26. Nxd6+ Kxg7 27. Nxe8+ Qxe8 28. Rfe1 {White is clearly better.})
22. Nxc6 bxc6 23. Bh7+ Kh8 24. Bd3 $14 {Most probably Anand had some idea
which I just miss! I'm also not sure how easy is the calculation of 21...Nxc3
over the board.}) 19... Bxf5 20. Bxf5  Rc5 21. Rfe1  (21. Rc1 $5 {is an interesting option,
but whatever Black plays he is very close to equality. At least much closer
than in the 19.Nf3 line is Black doesn't have a clear way to exchange some
pieces.}) 21... Rxd5  22. Bc3Rxe1+
23. Rxe1  Bc5  24. Qc2  Bd4 ! {
Now the position is absolutely equal.  25. Bxd4  Rxd426. Qc8 g6  27. Bg4 h5  (27... Nxg4 $4 28. Re8+ $18) 28. Qxd8+  Rxd8 29. Bf3  b6  30. Rc1 Rd6 31. Kf1  a5 32. Ke2
Nd5 !? {The most dynamic. (32... Kf8 {is also equal.}) 33. g3 {
[%eval 8,0]} (33. Bxd5 Rxd5 34. Rc6 Re5+ 35. Kd3 b5 !? = {White's king can
never advance so easily due to some problems with the 2nd file!}) 33... Ne7 34.
Be4 Kg7 {Though equal score, the impression after four games is that Anand is
drawing with Black much more easily than Gelfand is. This means Gelfand is a
little bit under pressure, and that his team will have to find more resources
with White. But Gelfand's play is anyway very dynamic, and it is clear that
the Israeli will be ready to punish any mistake from his opponent. Let's not
forget that Gelfand had more problems with Black, but also played riskier
openings: and the result 0-1 also exists in chess!} 1/2-1/2

Etiquetas: 2012, D45, Gallery, India, Israel, Tretyakov, World Chess Championship
Posted in Boris Gelfand, Moscovo, russia, VISWANATHAN ANAND | Sem coment�rios